It seems that I often read here on the forums about the undesirability of electronic controls as opposed to mechanical timers etc. But is it really the electronics that deserve the blame? Surely we can all admit that computer control can add some advantageous options to an appliance.
Properly designed and constructed electronic controls _should be_ far more reliable then anything mechanical in the long term. Solid state electronics don't wear out but they can be damaged by impulses etc if they aren't engineered correctly. Note I'm not saying that current appliance controls are properly designed...
Today the case is often that costs have been slashed and quality has been cut to meet the target price. I believe cost cutting and poor design will also effect mechanical timers too. Will a mechanical timer made today still be hauling-the-mail in 50 years?? I don't think today's mechanicals will be as durable and overbuilt as those of the past. And its not a fault of the timer being mechanical, its that quality costs money and people don't buy for quality these days.
With any appliance made today the control(s), be they electronic or mechanical, will likely be unavailable in 10-15 years. Perhaps some NOS parts will be available but control failure may doom the machine.
I have a suspicion that mechanical timers built today will likely prove less easily serviceable then ones made in the past. In order to make things more inexpensively, assemblies are crimped, welded or bonded together. Using screws crews cost money and increases failures. While electronic controls do use components that are either proprietary or may have short End of Life availability, many of the components that fail an electronic control can be substituted with a different part to get the control running again. My opinion is that the electronic boards may be more repairable then a mechanical timer on down the road.
To a large extent the considered non-repair ability and fear of electronics is due to the fact that electronic technology is not as well understood by many repair people. For most of us the mechanical parts are easy to see and figure out, electronics are more of a "black art". It reminds me a lot of how automotive mechanics took to fuel injection. Fuel injection is easier to diagnose and repair then a carburetor, you can do tests and actually isolate the failed part. A carburetor has to be torn down and rebuilt with the hope (fingers crossed) that the problem was fixed. Personally I'd much rather repair a FI system then a carburetor. For full disclosure my opinion of electronics is somewhat biased by having a background in the electronics field.
I only throw this out there to offer a different viewpoint on current controls available in modern machines. I really believe that it is the cost cutting that will cause today's machines to be less long lived then their predecessors. This may spark some lively discussion, now where did I put my asbestos underwear??
Properly designed and constructed electronic controls _should be_ far more reliable then anything mechanical in the long term. Solid state electronics don't wear out but they can be damaged by impulses etc if they aren't engineered correctly. Note I'm not saying that current appliance controls are properly designed...
Today the case is often that costs have been slashed and quality has been cut to meet the target price. I believe cost cutting and poor design will also effect mechanical timers too. Will a mechanical timer made today still be hauling-the-mail in 50 years?? I don't think today's mechanicals will be as durable and overbuilt as those of the past. And its not a fault of the timer being mechanical, its that quality costs money and people don't buy for quality these days.
With any appliance made today the control(s), be they electronic or mechanical, will likely be unavailable in 10-15 years. Perhaps some NOS parts will be available but control failure may doom the machine.
I have a suspicion that mechanical timers built today will likely prove less easily serviceable then ones made in the past. In order to make things more inexpensively, assemblies are crimped, welded or bonded together. Using screws crews cost money and increases failures. While electronic controls do use components that are either proprietary or may have short End of Life availability, many of the components that fail an electronic control can be substituted with a different part to get the control running again. My opinion is that the electronic boards may be more repairable then a mechanical timer on down the road.
To a large extent the considered non-repair ability and fear of electronics is due to the fact that electronic technology is not as well understood by many repair people. For most of us the mechanical parts are easy to see and figure out, electronics are more of a "black art". It reminds me a lot of how automotive mechanics took to fuel injection. Fuel injection is easier to diagnose and repair then a carburetor, you can do tests and actually isolate the failed part. A carburetor has to be torn down and rebuilt with the hope (fingers crossed) that the problem was fixed. Personally I'd much rather repair a FI system then a carburetor. For full disclosure my opinion of electronics is somewhat biased by having a background in the electronics field.
I only throw this out there to offer a different viewpoint on current controls available in modern machines. I really believe that it is the cost cutting that will cause today's machines to be less long lived then their predecessors. This may spark some lively discussion, now where did I put my asbestos underwear??