General Motors Strike

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

48bencix

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
797
Location
Sacramento CA
The Strike against General Motors has started. It is about job security. Here is the most interesting article I have found about it.

I have stated before and still believe that GM and Ford will eventually go bankrupt. If you look at their products it appears that that's what they want. And, besides one VW I bought in 1979 (Super Beetle Convertible) all of my cars are GM or Ford.

Martin

 
I Wish Them The Best of British Luck

Yeahbut, you can only beat a dead horse but so long.

GM does not have much wiggle room, unless Congress tamps down imports including American manufacturers that make products abroad and ship them home, GM simply cannot afford to have things the way they were and remain a viable player in the automotive business. Oh, don't forget all those Asian car makers building non-union plants in America.

L.
 
We used to be a GM family from the 50's to the mid 70's. That's when I believe that GM started producing crap for automobiles. We've looked at them over the years, and the only thing I'd ever consider owning from GM is a Chevy Truck/SUV.
Outside of those, I think their cars look cheap and offer lackluster styling. Other manufacturers offer much more for the money.
 
I've never...

had a big problem with any of my GM cars (5 so far), and though my father worked for them for years, I can't stand unions. Their day was long ago but now they're just greedy. That's not to say the factories/companies aren't, but where else can you get a job where you might work maybe 2-4 out of the 8 hours you're paid for?

$0.02

Chuck
 
I gave up on General Motors after they killed Oldsmobile. We were GM for years and years. I wouldn't care if they went under, except for the innocent employees there. The fat-cat CEOs and the like can stick it.
 
except for the innocent employees there

Like the guy who gets paid $20/hr for sweeping?

I doubt any of the union reps tell their members how it really breaks down. Let's say a guy makes $20 and hour (in a union auto industry job, that's on the lower side). Gets paid for 40 hours. That's $800 a week. Now, the union tells them to go on strike. For every week that guy's out, he's losing $800. If the union is trying to get him an extra $0.50 an hour, he'll have to work 1600 hours (40 weeks, or the better part of a year) just to make up one week's worth of strike.
Drag it into a month, which is more likely than not, and he needs to work 160 weeks, or more than 3 years, just to break even for the $$ he lost on strike. Yes, I know other things go along with negotiations, like increases for pensions and other non-dollar things, but I'm just talking about the $$.

That's what he pays his union dues for. By the way, you don't think the BA's and other union execs don't draw a salary in sympathy of their members while they're on strike, do you? Of course they get paid! THAT's what the union dues really pay for!

Job security? How about doing an honest day's work for an honest day's pay. That's the best way to keep your company solvent (that goes for the fat-cats especially!!).

Don't even get me started on the outlandish salaries (non-union) pro-athletes get!!!

Sorry for ranting, but the union's been targeting our bus lot for several years, and they haven't even gotten a toe in the door, much less a foot.......yet.

Chuck
 
I'm a union employee, and damn proud of it. I also work very hard for my money, and I don't begrudge my union dues at all.

Unions are far from perfect, that's for sure - but they are a lot better than having some naive belief that the company will look out for you. I've been down that path before.

It isn't the UAW's fault that GM has bad marketing, or that our country has a ridiculous healthcare system, or we've let our politicians sell off our manufacturing base.

People need to grow up and stop dealing with simple-minded generalities and stereotypes, especially when they have no idea of what they're talking about, vis-a-vis union membership. That's part of why we're in the mess we're currently in.
 
GM Vauxhall

Hi Folks,
The worst car I have ever owned was a GM Vauxhall Vectra, it had 30 major mechanical failures in the 10 months I owned it. The rear tyres wore through to the wire every 1000 miles due to a defect in the rear suspension. The door mouldings actually started to peel off the doors, not a single body panel was properly aligned and to crown it all one of the doors had been damaged and re painted in the factory.
I had to auction it as no dealership would accept it as a trade in, I lost £10,000 in 10 months!

I have been driving Ford cars ever since and have hod no problems whatsoever with any of my Ford Mondeos.

I will never buy a GM vehicle again.

David
 
GM is getting what it deserves. I have had plenty of new and used GM cars over the past 20 years. I switched to Honda last year and life is good. I no longer have to wait on parts, hang out while they fix some stupid problem, go through brake pads, and figure out why this light is on or this part is falling off. My Honda is a far superior product. Had they kept Oldsmobile, I may have bought another one. Since Olds is gone, so am I. I even got rid of my GM card with over $500 still on it toward the purchase of a new GM car. I doubt if I ever buy another American made car again. Funny though, my Accord is more American made than my last Olds!

--Tom
 
some naive belief that the company will look out for you

The days of the company looking out for the employee are, sadly, nearly gone. It's rare to find, at best.

Dan, I meant no disrespect. Yes, what I wrote was a generality, and I didn't include a "present company excluded" or "I'm sure not everyone is like this" but I've found this bunch to generally assume that. I shouldn't have left it out.

I certainly know less than you about union membership, but isn't what I said about strikes and pay true? I don't think it warranted the "have no idea of what they're talking about" comment.

But, when I hear the stories my father would tell about some of the shennanigans at work, it was terrible. Most of the time, if you were skilled maintenance (sp?) like a pipe-fitter or electrician, you had it made. You'd have a heavy load on changeover, and a few heavy stretches otherwise, but most days you'd do about 2-or-so hours of work. And I see it first-hand when there are N-Star (utility), National Grid (utility) and Verizon (phone) trucks always parked on the side of the road with the occupants sitting doing nothingbut talking or sometimes napping. I'm sure plenty of non-union workers are doing the same thing, but they're not in highly-visible vehicles.

How about the new Verizon installer who was cornered by his fellow workers because he was working at a normal pace? IIRC, he was doing about 5 new installs a day. The average, at the Verizon-union-employee snail's pace was 2. 2 new installs in an 8 hour period! No wonder people were waiting weeks and then had to be home for an 8 hour window for installation! That's not just one bad worker; it's the whole group of installers!

I'm sure that there are MANY examples of good union workers, MANY more so than bad. However, when the bad ones are "protected" by the union, they get away with it. If they were pulling the same thing and weren't union, they'd have been fired... and rightly so.

And I know unions were instrumental in closing down a lot of sweat shops, getting better working conditions, hours, pay, benefits, etc. However, they've already done all that. I'm greatful, but believe their time is largely done. I also believe that it's probably the Fat-Cat's greed, as well as the worker's greed, fueled by unions, that has just about dropped this country's manufacturing in the shitter. Everyone's entitled. I'm not just talking about GM, or their advertising, or manufacturing. It's no wonder so many plants open across the border or outsource their support to other countries. Or, that international firms are setting up non-union shops here. Guaranteed they're filling them with workers who are paid a normal working wage.

I had a couple of union workers, out of work, picketing a store I managed in a mall because our remodeling was being done by a crew the company hired to travel store-to-store. The picketers were nice guys, and we had several good conversations in down time (I'd get them coffee; they'd grab my lunch if I was alone). One of them was brought about because of the flyers they had available for people to take. Something about the workers doing the construction were being paid a sub-standard wage and yada yada yada. When all was said and done, it was agreed that what that really meant was that these workers were being paid a normal wage, not an inflated union "standard" wage.

Again, Dan, I meant no malice toward you or any other hard-working union worker. I apologize for the generality.

Chuck
 
Rich, here's the thing: It takes two to tango - management and labor. I've actually been on both sides of the table, but in wildly different industries (hospitality and utility)so I think I have a pretty good perspective on things.

Management signs off on the contracts, which would mean that management knows what the work rules are and knows what the discipline procedure is. The trouble is that too many lazy, inept, or over-worked managers don't read the contracts, and don't know the work rules, then blame the union for bad employees and/or low productivity.

Yes, sometimes unions protect bad employees, but it is part of their job to represent *all* employee's interest in conflicts - just like talent agents or attorneys do in sports and showbiz. If the management has their ducks in a row, they can contest the protection, and usually win. But it takes time, and documentation to do that, and too many manager won't do that - or they are so overworked themselves that they can't do that.

Also, sometimes union employees don't take an active role in their union, and bad things (corruption, croneyism) can come of that - but that's not exclusive to unions. That's probably the worst internal problem facing unions today, and it's something I struggle with myself.

But consider this: When a business is not union, the good benefits that the employees receive is many times because of fear of the unions. When I worked for Mutual of Omaha, they lived in mortal fear of organization. Because of that, they spent a lot of money on perks to keep the employees from organizing. When the labor movement was effectively squashed during the Reagan years, a lot of those perks went away, along with a lot of the jobs. The same is true today at the Fairmont Hotel in Seattle, who have paid well over union scale for all employees for years, so they won't have to deal with the hotel union.

Lastly, it's not like the UAW is strike crazy: this is the first strike they have engaged in since the 1970's. That's a pretty good track record, if you ask me.
 
Multi issues for my 2 cents, I am thinking the big TWO would not blink an eye to pull the plug, unload the pensions and the health care. I was raised on GM dollars, and Dad worked Hard for every one of them, he consistently bought Ford's after he retired. He never did say why, he changed to Ford. Actions speak a lot Louder than words though. There used to be an old GM employee quip, "We do not build cars, We build CAREERS"
 
ok....here we go...

Why should your employer ''look out for you?'' IF you were doing your work as you should be, then why would a company get rid of you? Once upon a time the Unions had a place, but I'm afraid that time is L O N G past. Now the Unions are nothing more than organized crime. More leeches stealing from the working man with enough propaganda to make the worker think that it's for their own good. The only good it's for, is the Union bosses pockets. The unions are what killed the coal mining business in West Virginia. The Union bosses got paid, but the workers that were on strike sure didn't! (actually they got 1/8th pay for a year) When the mines shut down, there were THOUSANDS of men and women that were out of work. Communities disappeared. The older miners that had no education, were just shit out of luck. What did the Union do for them???
Detriot and other car cities, are already hurting. This will surely be the end of OUR auto industry. Care for a car made in Mexico??? Mark
 
I agree, Mark. As I said before, they have HAD their time. They did do some good in earlier days though as I stated earlier. However, I also agree with Dan that SOME of the gains made by non-union workers may be attributed to fear of unions.

Chuck

p.s.- Dan, I noticed you addressed your note to Rich. I, Chuck, am the author of the posts in this thread. Rich is far too diplomatic to have written what I wrote. We both post under the same name because I am still living under the delusion that I'm not involved in appliance collecting!!!
 
....and by the way.....

...my Grandfather was one of the men that worked in the coal mines. He died of black lung. The Union had been in the mines for years before he worked there. While he got decent pay, it really was just enough to live on. The union NEVER addressed long term health issues like Black Lung, Asbestosis, etc....and when I was teaching, I was a member of the Teacher's Union. They were about as helpful as titties on a bull. Mark
 
Mark, no one is saying that an employer should "look after you" - That's the whole reason why people organize in the first place. And what's up with the term "union bosses"? Are you stuck in some 1940's noir film? :-)

The machines that we all admire were made by union labor. Those employees were unionized in the first place because of terrible working conditions and low pay - like the conditions found in the mines of West Virginia prior to the UMW. Do you think the machines have gotten better because they're largely not made by union labor anymore? And if union workers were so overpaid, why haven't we seen a marked reduction in the price of these goods that are now made overseas by low-paid workers?

Speaking of miners, I think the events of the last few years have shown that the miner's lot in life has not been improved by losing UMW protections. Or are a few miner's lives a small price to pay to fatten the pockets of the owners? (Who are, after all, the real "bosses")

The unions built the middle class in this country. They're not for every industry, but they are also nothing to be afraid of, or threatened by.

Study US history - or European history, for that matter - and you'll know why unions are important.
 
It's so sad...

....dalangdon, that you actually believe the crap that you write here. The union is for your OWN good.....REALLY! Now say that over and over and eventually you'll believe it. In todays verbage they are not ''union bosses'' I guess they are the executives.....is that the new term? Mark
 

Latest posts

Back
Top