History of vacuum Powernozzle's

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support AutomaticWasher.org:

Does this sound like a power nozzle?

My mom still, somewhere, has a Eureka "canister" type vacuum. It is kind of a bloated rectangle in shape.

It has an attachment that replaces the standard floor/carpet head. It looks like a king sized version of the standard head, but there are three rows of rollers. When the suction starts, these rollers "beat" on the carpet. It makes alot of noise, and I think my mom only used it a few times.

In fact, it scared me a little growing up!!!!
 
"Vibra-beat".

IIRC Miele currently offers this type of a air-powered brush and tsays that it is thorough and gentle.

Read: cheaper to make and less efective than a power-nozzle.
 
That page is too cool!!! I thought the history of the Electrolux rug/floor tool was great! I had the later grey version with the ribbed bar that came with my Silverado (no longer have that one), and I now have an earlier one (that Al Maytagluver sent me...thanks!) for the Electrolux Model S with the "Gleaner". Looking forward to using that one!

I also didn't realize the Turb-O-Tool was so versatile and could have been used as a drill...amazing!
 
Don you are so right!!! Electrolux or anyone for that matter who would make a vacuum like the G would really do well. Terry
 
Smitty....

You may be right.

Tell you guys what, I am going over there today and I will take pics of this vacuum. Been meaning to do that anyways...

KP
 
Very interesting. Thanks for posting, Terry. Especially interesting was Electrolux's patent for the never-produced power head attached directly to the motor unit - no hose or wands. This basic idea actually was manufactured by Westinghouse as the "Converto-vac" for a few years in the 60's.
 
Rich, you are so right, I had forgotten about the Westinghouse Converto Vac!! I always thought that was a neat machine but from what I have heard never a real great cleaner. Glad you enjoyed the site. Terry
 
That site was sweet...but....

1. The first Lewyt "Powernozzle" wasn't a powernozzle at all. It was setup like a Bissell Carpet Sweeper, where the wheels in the nozzle were the basis of motion for the revolving brush. This was also just an "option" for the basic Lewyt pot models 44-55-66 with the standard rug brush being supplied with the total purchase price. This is the item that you see in the cariacture on the site. It's not an actual picture of the machine.

For whatever reason, I cannot find the advert that I have which lists the "Carpet Sweeper" attachment and it's actual reatil price to consumer dated from 1954 according to my catalouge sheet of what adverts I have. It was offered with the pot style Lewyt's only as described, and not with the later Big Wheel models. As has been pointed out to me before.

The site was absolutly correct about the power to the nozzle going thru the hose on the metal coils...just like they do today. And that it "WAS" a direct connect like I stated on here before offering no pigtails...the current running down two metal strips inside the wand..where it was distributed down into the powernozzle housing to the motor. But this wasn't used until 1958's Lewyt Big Wheel Electronic 1000.

This is the machine that is shown in the small advert on the site. And after extensive reasearch on my own, there is no evidence that Lewyt made this machine after 1961.

In fact to go back to the first Lewyt nozzle for a second, period Lewyt Adverts of around 1953-1954. for this "carpet sweeper" innovation, tell of being able to use this "Sweeper" for between cleanings, then just hook up the hose and the dirt in the sweepers receptacle dissappears , and you can clean thouruoghly your carpeting with Lewyt's "Super Suction" and sweeping action.

2. The powerbrush offered by Singer was made by Preco Industries and was offered not only to Singer...with it's own label affixed to the housing, but to other manufacturers as well. In fact in many "home based" periodicals of the day "Better Homes and Gardens e.g" for example, where you would finda small advertisement in the back of the "zine" offering this option made for "all vacuum cleaners" for around $30.00.

3. In most serious collectors opinions within the context of vacuum cleaner collection and history..the first "true" powered nozzle goes to Air-Way Electric Corporation from Toledo Ohio. Air-Way used the first powerhead nozzle on it's early uprights like the Scout Model from 1933 or somewhere in there.

It's motor for suction was up the handle like five inches from where the powerhead was, and the two were connected..while not direct connect, by a pigtail. If you wondering what I mean and would like a visual aide..go to www.air-way.net and look at the History section. In that you will see the Air-Way Scout model with it's powerhead. For those who don't want to...it basically looks like one of the Old Regina Electric Brooms with a powernozzle, just with an outside bag not the round cloth one like on the Regina.

4. Eureka's Vibra beat was a very neat and simple solution to a very "complex" problem e.g "getting power to the nozzle",although it just diddn't do the job as well as it was intended eveyone who used one...and those who tested the device like "Consumers Union/Consumers Reports" said that it diddn't do any better thant he regualr nozzle supplied ...and it was the loudest thing to ever appear on a vacuum cleaner in their opinion's. Eureka thankfully got with the program and by 1972 offered a proper electric nozzle...that everyone else in the industry used like Tri-Star, Rainbow and Fairfax for example.

5. The Electrolux section of the site was awesome, and I learned things there that I will not question or comment on. Yes it's true that Electrolux went crazy over their new Powernozzle option and was the main manufacturer to make it a popular item next to Sears with the Power-Mate.

6. There was a company called I believe ABC Industries. They made one of the first commercially available powerheads to the industry. Their head was called the "Always Beauty Clean". I have very sketchy info on this item, but he powerhead was used by Air-Way after 1966, on General Electric machine for thier first powerhead SwivelTop model after 1970, and was also the very first powerhead for Compact as well, Royal also used this nozzle for it's canister cleaners after 1975 or so. I'd like corrections if Im wrong here.

The year for the intro of Compacts powerhead, I'm not sure on ???TOLIVAC??? when was the powerhead first offered for Compact was it 64'? do you know??? Anyways, this ABC Powerhead lookes strikingly similar to the Lewyt's powerhead seen in the photo mentioned elsewhere.

In many ways it's rather tough to pinpoint exact dates for me as Im not home as of now..Im currently searching for new Digs in Ypsilanti Michigan as personal problems have made this necescary. Therefore I'm at a freinds house and have no access to my stashof stuff. I will look when I go home this Tuesday.

Anyway that's my $.25 cents worth.

Chad
 
Darn, Eureka gone....

It was a Eureka Vibra Beat...at least that sounds right.

I went to my parents with camera in hand today to find out that the Eureka burnt out years ago and they either threw it away or gave it to the Salvation Army.

They now have an upright, and a lousy "Shark" vacuum.

Sidenote, how does "Shark" stay in business. My parents Shark is lousy, and I bought their steamer which would steam away nothing, and brought it back for a refund.

Oh and the "Eureka Vibra beat" was in fact the noisiest contraption I have heard!!!!

Here it is, just as I remember it. Looks innocent huh!

http://cgi.ebay.com/EUREKA-VACUUM-V...ryZ43529QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
 
WOW...I can use this on the Eureka stick vacuum that Toggle gave me!!

Noisy and ineffective or not, it looks like FUN!
 
Westy it was bizarre....

I remember my mom used it only a few times, like in "spring cleaning".

The one time I used it was about 12. Old enough to not be scared of such things, but it was so noisy it did creep me out a bit. Never wanted to do that again!

But I say go for it. Nowadays it would be trippy.
 
Interesting link-esp like the home theater shots-and the film clip of the curtains in action.Does the setup have masking as well?-anyway back to powernozzles-I really don't know when the first one appeared on the Compact-Tri-Star.I just recall it was made by Eureka.I am finding just who really came out with the first cansister powernozzle to be sketchy.The Lewyt one sounds like a contender.For the air-Way-thought their so called "powernozzle" cleaner was their upright made around 1939 or the forties-They did it to skirt Hoovers patents.also the air-Way roller brush was a completely diffrent design than Hoovers.The Air-Way machine could be considered the first twin-motor upright!
I am not famaliar with the Eureka "Vibra-Beat" nozzle-Was this an air operated device-worked from the air flow from the vacuum cleaner itself.The Turbine powered "powernozzles" are still with us-the Miele an example.Its another plus for the vac maker-he does not have to put wires in the vac hose or wands-but the turbine ones are less effective than the true motorized nozzles.Some of the airflow is "robbed" to power the nozzle brush.they are also good to use with vacs that didn't origianlly have powernozzles. Rug Rat makes both a handheld power nozzle and a floor type-both turbine powered.I also was at a dealer in Front Royal Va-they were a NSS dealer and sold a n air powered powernozzle to use with NSS M1 vacs and others that had the larger commercial hoses.It was very effective-could not remember the maker-was not made by NSS.It was the only air powered nozzle I tried that would truely work.I would figure the very high airflow of the M1 is the answer.
 
Tolivac....

As memory serves me this was completely air powered. I don't remember any wires going to it, in fact, I am sure there was none. That is what makes this thing kind of amazing...it made so much noise for something just powered from the vacuum.

I am not kidding when I say that within a few moments, you really wanted to turn it off!
 
On Powerheads....

I guess that in this instance there is no real winner as to who was the first with the powernozzle they all came out within a shade of each other Lewyt/ Sears Kenmore-Whirlpool/Electrolux. I agree with you totally Tolivac that Air Way had the first twin motor upright cleaner as there is total evidence to this. I have seen AirWay's brush mandrel and agree again totally that it was far different from Hoover's, but they infringed just enough on Hoovers patents where after a lengthy and costly battle, A High court in Ohio sided with Hoover nad also sided with Air-Way. There is a small story that I have been told with similar points, and theirin lies s a small story attached to this post..

The story is this....The final confrontation with Hoover v.s Air-Way as I have been told from various vacuum collector sources tell it this way... It came with the intorduction of the Air-Way DirtMaster Model cleaner introduced in 1937. This was the first single motor and ONLY single motor Air-Way upright that was ever manufactured. It's design was startingly similar to the then late model Hoover 150 from 1936. It had a revolving brush with two plastic beaters that were metal tipped with several brushes going straight across the mandrel, but were spaced in different loactions around it. It of course used Air-ways superior Cellulose paper bag as well encased in a simple to use leatherette casing that made bag changing almost painless. It had a Headlight the first and only Air-Way to have this feature, a six position height adjustment and so on.

It also featured a similar side inlet fot the suction attachments like the 150, which employed a mechanical changer device to direct the full suction from the twin fans from the agitator cavity to the suction inlet, which even Hoover couldnt claim. Their side inlet machine leaked air and had fairly poor airflow to their attachments. The handle was far different from previous model uprights being very Hooveresque' in the respect that the handle was not hollow, but very similar to the Hoover having a rear mounted switch and the cord coming out in a similar place.

Another unique design of this machine was the fac that it employed twin fans that were mounted high and to the rear using twin rubber belts to drive them, and then a single belt ran down from the motor on the left right hand side facing the machine, to the brush from the horizontal motor. I really cannot perfectly describe how this setup looks, and my Dirtmaster owners manual dating 1939 doesnt show the entire mechanism.

Anyway the machine was VERY good in fact too good for Hoover's taste , as in the past Hoover merely "winked" at potential violations of their principals where AirWay was concerned. And of course, they as well as most manufacturer's bought competitior products and tested and tore them apart and found that DirtMaster model Air-Way was close, too close as ever to beating them in their game....

In fact becasue of Air-Way's exclusive "cellulose" paper bag feature it was substantially better than the Hoover 150 in terms of filtration and ease of use in that area. For a quick minute starting with the latter Hoover 1940 model 60 which was the prewar Hoover model 61 (postwar), this Hoover came with the first version of the HandiSac. Hoover did this as a "nudge" to Air-Way in response to Air-Way using their beater bar principal that they obvioulsy invented with the Hoover model 700 in 1927. Air-Way in turn "Winked back" to Hoover by cranking up production of their DirtMaster, and subsequent Dual Motor Scout models until the unfortunate court proceedings came about..

Hoover then being #1 in the industry, was a much more stonger influential company in that time and had resources and lawyers who fought Air-Way tooth and nail,after deciding that they were done with Air-Way's flagrant misuse of their inventions decided to take it to court. There the company proved that ANY machine that used a beater bar was OBVIOUSLY infringing on their patents, and that Air-Way's proved that their patents were also being infringed on as well...where the court basically said...Air Way no more beater bars, and Hoover No more paper bags.

What really was the case was that the smaller Air-Way firm decided to drop all their uprights completly in 1941- and concentrate on their newly designed "vertical cansiter"....the Sanitizor with the model 55. They figured that the canister market was only intact because of Electrolux, and that no one else was really in that market at the time. By 1955 they were having second thoughts becasue that market was also crowded, and Air-Way's patent on the paper bag ran out in 1952 so everyone had it by that time. However, the verdict was in and Air-Way soldiered on reguardless.

And of course it was 25 years before Air-Way had a motorized brushroll again with the 88 Mark II, appropriatly nameplating the nozzle, whilst not built by themselves "RugMaster" in lieu to a market that they abaondoned long ago...the upright market. And they have never to my knowledge reappeared in this market and Steve Tomberlin in a long conversation he had with me several years back when I had called him personally told me he wans't interested in cracking that market again...and in his slow southern drawl, said why would I tinker with somthing that has worked well and continues to do so for the last 62 years ( him refereing to the Sanitizor). He also pretty much agreed with the story that I have had told to me and he said that while a few things were tweaked for "lore" it was pretty much as happened and told.

As far as the Vibra-Beat from what I can tell it appeared about 1957...I have had a Prince II Eureka built canister a few years back about 1997 which at that time I had dated to approximatly 1966 as to build year according to Eureka. It came with the Vibra Beat,plus a regular nozzle as well as all the other attachments in a caddy... and found that while viscious sounding...like a small jackhammer it diddn't do a bad job, just an unpleasnat one like Kevin noted. And that because of it's violent shaking, Eurekas then twist tight wands would uncerimoniously come apart while using it, which happened to ME numerous times while sing it. And that there was IMHO the main reason that it was dicontinued as soon as they brought forth their own electric nozzle in 1972. The other obviously noted problem was that after vacuuming with that machine about five times the beater really diddn't function as well becasue...well the suction was dropped enough to make a noticeable difference.

Anyway that's my dollars worht for now...

Chad
 
Some additional notes

Chad,
You really nailed the story of Air-Way -vs- Hoover very well and few know about the terrible lawsuits that nearly shut down both companies. There was one other 2 motor upright that Air-Way built and it was, "The Chief", just before the Dirtmaster. The 3 upright 2 motors were: The Scout, The Chief and The Dirtmaster. Air-Way did built upright one motor vaccums for many years prior to the Scout but they were all straight suction machines.

The Dirtmaster, according to several sources, was never a terrific vacuum and had problems. Production was a small number and few are to be found surviving today. The previous 2 motor uprights were far better vacuums and the hose in the handle end worked much better.

As an Air-Way distributor, I have spoken with Steve also and he just doesn't understand those of us that like vintage machines. Also, Don Clark has been a wealth of information. He was the one that brought the power nozzle to the 88 Mark II. The first one used was a Hamilton Beech upright converted to fit the 88. He did this without Air-Way's corporate knowledge and temporarily lost his job as the National Sales Distributor. Eventually, Air-Way used an upright Eureka modified as a power nozzle. Both the HB and Eureka "power nozzles" were not well suited the way Air-Way was using them. Since they were both complete upright machines less the bag and a hollow tube made to fit on the bag flange to go into hose end, they blew/forced the dirt to go into the vacuum faster than the machine could handle the air flow using the 7 amp twin fan motor. If you changed the bag each time you used the vacuum, it would work. However, the whole set up is terribly bulky. The Eureka power heads were used on the Mark V as well, in the gold color, the 88 Mark II in turquoise. (There is a picture of one in my collection on this site)

Eventually, Air-Way did manufacture their own power nozzle as you mentioned, the Rugmaster. Later it was private labeled for Air-Way by Royal and finally Douglas until Hayden was selected for the current models.

Air-Way at one time was one of the "Kings" of door to door sales. Since they never elected to change the basic machine and do no marketing, they have been left behind. I still firmly believe the current Air-Way, for the money, is the finest vacuum one can purchase with the best filtration. I hope they remain a viable concern for years to come. The wood pulp cellulose bag is only challenged on filtration by Filter Queen which uses the same material for their filter cone. I would hate to see Air-Way follow in the footsteps of Packard, Pan American World Airways, Woolworths, etc., because of lack of change but only time will tell.

Long live, "Sanitation to the nation", as pioneered by Air-Way and thanks for you well written and informative posting.
 
Very informative on the Hoover-versus Air-Way.Infringed on two things-Hoover after Air-Way for the beater bar roller brush-and air Way versus Hoover on the paper bag. air-Ways bag is Light years ahead of anyone eleses except the Filtrete bags-They make the bags themselves and even the long cellulose fiber paper needed to make them.They also told me the Air-Way canister bags made today will fit any of their canister machines-from the "fireplug" models to present.The power nozzles on the present machines come from Panasonic.Panasonic provided power nozzles for Royal,and Kenmore.Its a good effetive nozzle.
I am not clear on the air-Way twin fan system-is it sort of like the Riccar Radiance upright?-the first motor and fan pushes the air into the bag-also drive the roller brush-and the second motor and fan pulls from the outside of the bag.It is used by itself when you use the vac hose.
 
Power Nozzles manufacturing

Not to be critical but informative, the Cen-Tec/Hayden company manufactures the power nozzles for Royal, Kenmore and Air-Way as well as others. They have over "100 years experience in floor-care and related industries." The parent company is called Cen-Tec and their website can be visited at:
www.centecsystems.com

Charlie
 
Twin Fans Motors

Twin fan motors in canisters refers to the number of fans in the motor creating air flow hence suction. Typically, lesser priced canister vacuums use one fan and the higher end two fans. There were some three fans in days gone by but I'm not sure if any are in production today. Many changes have been made in technology so some high end vacuums such as the current Rainbow, uses a single fan and has very effective air flow/suction. Their earlier models did have three fans and were great vacuums that are still going strong today.
 
Vac motors-Yes ,I know about the twin fan motors in most canister vacs and clean air uprights-with these the motor is "axial"-like a miniature jet engine-the fans generate the suction airflow and also cool the motor-thats why those will overheat if the bag is full or the hose clogged.Triple fan motors could refer that the motor itself has its own fan for cooling and the other two for cleaning airflow. these are also used in most wert-dry vacs to conform to new safety requirements that a vac for wet pickup the motor must be isolated from the damp airstream.Rainbow vacs are made this way., Same with Watermatic and Fairfax.In most tradional "dirty air" vac fan systems the motor also has its own fan for cooling the motor.The new Switched Reluctance motor in the Rainbow E2 vfacs has the isolated cooling syustem.Even has a filter for the motor to protect the bearings!There are no brushes in the Rainbow SR motor. Dyson is working on one as well-they call it the "Digital motor" its used in the DC12 cansister.
 
Triple fans...

The Hoover suitcase portable, Slimline, and early Swingette models were equipped with triple fan motors.
In twin fan version, the same motor powered the Dial-A-Matic upright
 
Great information guys!

It's great reading all of this interesting information, especially about the "famous" Air-Way! I had heard of a Dirtmaster before, but never knew the story or of any models left in existance. Are there any remaining models or pictures? Seems as impossible to find as a Hoover Model O...

The twin-motor Scout and Chief are really neat machines that IMHO were ahead of their time...I'd die if I found one of those! Same with the machines with the Don Clark/Eureka power nozzle; I've seen 2 on eBay before but that was it. Loved hearing the history of these at the Convention.

That's also interesting about Hoover using their twin-fan canister motor in the DAM. My late-70's DAM does sound more like a canister machine from that era than an upright...

--Austin
 
Hoover

Austin,
Hoover got their miles out of that motor for sure, and many many other parts as well.
For instance, the rear wheels on the Slimline/Portable Canisters were Dial-A-Matic front wheels...
I could go on forever!
 
Now that would be fun

Spending your day going thru all the factory parts bins and slapping together next years model. Most companies do that anyways to one degree or another, Oster takes the cake though when it comes to how many variations of a blender can we possibly come up with.
 
Back
Top