One thing I probably should mention.. If any of the new KitchenAids consume as much water as this Maytag, I think I would have gone with the KitchenAid...
Don't get me wrong I love the Maytag so far, but ... If the KitchenAid uses as much as this machine does, that means we'd almost be back to Hobart-esque machines... Could you imagine, The above pictured cleaning setup, the gluttonous water consumption that the Maytag has, adding steam and even the proscrub options to it? This truly would be a KitchenAid we've been waiting to replace the hobart machines with.
I'll stick with my Maytag for a while, but heres hoping KitchenAid is going back to high water usage and food grinders
I did notice that I could do a quick cycle with heated dry and it was under 90 minutes and was over 10 gallons of water in consumption.. The glasses and stoneware came out clean.. I've yet to flick any debris off of anything.
Don't get me wrong I love the Maytag so far, but ... If the KitchenAid uses as much as this machine does, that means we'd almost be back to Hobart-esque machines... Could you imagine, The above pictured cleaning setup, the gluttonous water consumption that the Maytag has, adding steam and even the proscrub options to it? This truly would be a KitchenAid we've been waiting to replace the hobart machines with.
I'll stick with my Maytag for a while, but heres hoping KitchenAid is going back to high water usage and food grinders

I did notice that I could do a quick cycle with heated dry and it was under 90 minutes and was over 10 gallons of water in consumption.. The glasses and stoneware came out clean.. I've yet to flick any debris off of anything.