Most Maddening Washer Commerical

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support AutomaticWasher.org:

 
Whirlpool's snubber doesn't have as much effect as may be presumed.  Vintage service literature states that it should prevent a 4-1/2 pound weight from causing the tub to impact the cabinet during spin.  4-1/2 lbs.

Not to mention that the early models with the original tub ring design that's fully open (no raised interior edge) to water splashing during agitation at lower fill levels, soapy/slippery water substantially reduces the snubber's friction.
 
@GELaundryforEver: Yes indeed! The inner and outer tub would vigorously shake back and forth while the suspension rod sockets would loudly groan and the entire frame would just squeal. The noises were thee most awful. Rapid fire squeak groan squeak groan squeak groan squeak groan squeak groan squeak groan squeak groan squeak groan with some other nail on chalk board self destructing noises poking through on top of it for the whole duration of the agitation and it felt like you're ears had been violated in more than one way.

It was also that shacking that would often break the tub straps, resulting in the tub banging against the cabinet during spin.

The whole concept of suspending a short stroke tub brake transmission driven agitator with an instant spin cycle engagement low slip rapid acceleration clutch on 4 springs with thin rods is simply not practical.

Every other washer that mimics this system compensates for it by snubbering the tub and/or gearing the cycle so the tub does not oscillate or shack back and forth to such extremes during wash and spin ie a ramped spin and weak/no brake so the inner tub moves and not the outer tub.

Overall a very bad choice made worse by aggressive cheapening.
You could literally feel and watch the cabinet twisting on full loads of regular clothes, I.E. cotton/linen.
 
Which resulted in the most horrendous noise. The grinding noise of the suspension followed by the screeching of the outer cabinet. To bad more people did not make their own noise about it.
Especially after seeing the Whirlpool Design 2000 video, I'm now convinced more than EVER that Whirlpool was way ahead of their time. And don't even get me started about the underwater muffled banging from the dual action agitator.
 
Especially after seeing the Whirlpool Design 2000 video, I'm now convinced more than EVER that Whirlpool was way ahead of their time. And don't even get me started about the underwater muffled banging from the dual action agitator.


Design 2000 is the washer they are technically speaking of in this video, not the rancid model T. Design 2000 was novel and did not come from any old ideas.
 
Such a controversial thread this is!

As per the original title of this thread, "Maddening Washer Commercial", I have to add my own two cents and say that advertising-commericals are always "glorified" in their product presentation.
They have to be, of course, in order to sell their product.
"New" "Better" "Ideal" "Improved"....... and a host of other labels is used to sell anything from Snake Oil to Healthcare, to Insurance, to good honest products.
Nothing's sacred from this type of marketing.
However, it's apparent that this glorification of products has worked its way up to downright lies and misinformation over the decades.
To me, it's annoying,... to the gullible, naive, uninformed, it's like cheeze in a moustrap to a mouse.
The old saying: "A sucker is born every minute" applies here.
 
The Model T was heavily gloried. Advertisements of semi trucks resting on the machines, wine glasses tacked on top of one another, awards saying these machines saw the fewest number of repairs. Yes, that last part might actually have been true. When a Model T breaks it is cheaper to just junk the whole machine.
 
Back
Top