Phosphate bans in the 1970s

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

jamiel

Well-known member
Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
2,673
Location
Detroit, Michigan & Palm Springs, CA
I wasn't quite old enough to remember, but in looking at old Chicago Tribune newspapers I hadn't realized just how much drama there was about phosphate and non-phosphate detergents in the Great Lakes area. Apparently P&G actually took their detergents off the market in the city of Chicago for a time when there was a phosphate ban put in place for the city (but not the suburbs). My grandmother used the 5-gallon-bucket type detergent for many years in her Maytag in suburban Chicago and the lime encrustation was bad... I did some research (more accurately, opposition research) for one of the big chemical companies back in 1992 when I was between jobs looking at FOIA documents in several areas around big phosphate manufacturers (I remember in Pennsylvania and Tennessee).
 
I don't remember that about P&G taking detergents off the market. I do remember Consumers Reports harping on the generally poor performance of phosphate-free detergents and rating them separately. That's where I first found out about the glory of phosphates. ;)

Tennessee never banned phosphates, but by 1980 most of the budget brands like Ajax and Rinso were phosphate-free anyway, as was All, which had previously been quite good. P&G continued to have phosphate versions of all their brands, IIRC, but Lever and Colgate retained them only for a few top of the line detergents, like Fab and Surf.

Some chain stores carried only the phosphate free variants of the P&G brands so it paid to look at the labels and see what you were getting.
 
I recall my grandfather insisting on Fels laundry flakes because it had either the lowest level of phosphates or none at all..... the latter, I think.

I remember my grandmother occasionally adding Biz or something similar sometimes because it was necessary with Fels.

Looking back, I wonder if maybe my grandfather's position was that most detergents had higher levels of phosphate than were necessary to get clothes clean. Possible?

I'm old enough to recall the drama and the discussions in the family and hearing about it on the news, but not old enough to remember any specifics except for how phosphates were "bad" for the environment. All phosphates were eventually banned nationwide, right?

Jim
 
The opposition research was creating FOIA requests in areas around this company and it's competitors phosphate plants and inspecting the records in the county offices in these areas--they wanted information out of them (capacities, outputs, etc) but didn't want their hands on the FOIA request...plus if they had a request themselves they could say "look, we got examined as well." Kind of a fun project during a short period of unemployment.
Fels Naptha (or Instant Fels) was soap with some sodium carbonate (washing soda) builder...so Biz probably helped a lot. The top-line laundry detergents had a lot of phosphate to insure great washing everywhere--way more than needed in areas with soft river water.
 
Very clever with the research!

No, Jim, phosphates were not, and are not, banned nationwide; the detergent companies (and maybe big retailers) colluded to stop making them. Easier for them not to have two formulas, and nobody has a competitive advantage in the states where they're legal.
 
P&G

IRRC, Procter & Gamble sued the city of Chicago.. when stores were forced to remove Tide & other P&G detergents from store shelves, in the early 90's. I guess... they we're pretty mad about the considerable loss of sales, from losing a huge market.

I bet you can find the court case online, if you Googled it :)
 
Shoot, my custom skin lotion is 'built' with diammonium phosphate. That's how I get 10x the lanolin to emulsify in a standard triethanolamine-stearate base.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top