220V is safer
Why i said that
1) the change of a fire due to overload is much lower. (its more difficult to overload a 220V circuit)
2) The shock itself is dangerous (or twice dangerous), but safety devices, like circuit breakers, DR, etc have a minimal (but existent) change to go off faster than 110V, exactly because of the higher voltage. So ok, the shock itself is worse, but it may last a fraction of second less. and it can be the difference between life and death.
3) psichology factors... people naturally tend to be more cautious when they know it's 220V. so not because the voltage itself is safer, but because people have a better attitude and behavior when using 220V appliances.
Why i said that
1) the change of a fire due to overload is much lower. (its more difficult to overload a 220V circuit)
2) The shock itself is dangerous (or twice dangerous), but safety devices, like circuit breakers, DR, etc have a minimal (but existent) change to go off faster than 110V, exactly because of the higher voltage. So ok, the shock itself is worse, but it may last a fraction of second less. and it can be the difference between life and death.
3) psichology factors... people naturally tend to be more cautious when they know it's 220V. so not because the voltage itself is safer, but because people have a better attitude and behavior when using 220V appliances.