Why are you so focused on turnover?
Even if there was turn over, it would do nothing to clean the clothes in this design.
On the old design with the agitator moving quickly back and forth indpendently of tub, laundry and water, the side to side motion of the agitator moved the laundry up and down through the water.
As the tub was mostly motionless, the laundry was moved in a circle like motion up and down, being beaten by the agitator and rubbbing against the static tub.
The water moved in one direction alongside the laundry at mostly the exact same speed, thus more flowing with the items then through the fibres and items.
This is what you guys know as "roll over".
On this design, the tub, agitator and laundry move in unison. In relation to each other, there is barely any movement, thus barely any friction.
The agitator dosen't beat the clothes clean, they don't rub against the drum at high forces, thus, they get the incredible improvement in terms of gentleness that they claim to have achieved.
The wash action here that actually clean the clothes 95% based on water flow.
As laundry, tub and agiator move in unison in one direction, the water begins to flow with the motion of the laundry like on the old system.
As long as the water flows with the laundry at about the same speed, there is barely any friction between tub, agitator and laundry and the water once again dosen't flow through the laundry, but with it. There are close to no forces of friction or simmilar acting between laundry, tub/agitator and water.
Now, however, the drum and agitator suddenly and verry decisivley reverse.
So, agitator and tub now basicly instantly move in the opposite direction of laundry and water.
At this point, just after the reversing, there will be some friction between the laundry next to the tub walls and right next to the agitator. The majority of the load however which has no contact to the agitator or tub don't experience much friction or cleaning at all. Yet.
These pieces of laundry now begin to reverse their direction of movement and start to move again along side the agitator and tub.
Through some friction, the whole bunch that is the load of laundry pretty quickly begins to reverse as well and to flow - now again - together with all the other laundry, tub and agitator into the same direction.
That little bit of friction between the items here will contribute to cleaning, too.
However, only now the main cleaning action of an agitation stroke in this washer starts.
How?
The entire mass of these 20+gal of hot water mixed with detergent was moving in the same direction as everything else just a moment ago.
Now, even though tub, agitator and laundry have reversed their direction of movement, the water will still move and flow in the old direction.
As the water has a lot of inertia, it takes a decent amount of time for it to start to flow in unison with the laundry and wash unit again.
This means, while the water moves into one direction, the laundry is forced into the exact opposite direction.
It's like 2 cars driving behind each other, and the front car suddenly reverses out of thin air: The resulting collison has a lot of force.
As water and laundry now move exactly opposite to each other, the water is forced through the load, while the load is forced through the water. The pressure of this actions streams water through and arround every fibre, through every non-waterproof item, with it the detergents. That water movement carrys out soils gently and effectivley.
Before, the agitation moved the laundry through the water. But the water was baled to move along.
Now, the water is moved through the load.
Each time the agitub reverses, a powerfull flow of water is sent through every item in the load, just like a tidal wave on the beach that you run into, or - like I said - 2 cars hitting each other head on.
They took the typical step from thinking non-HE-washing to HE-washing:
Non-HE-washers were about moving laundry through water. Thus, laundry had to float, and had to move at a rather fast pace.
HE-washers (and that is true for TLs and FLs) are about moving water through the laundry. That is what recirculation pumps, spin-spray pretreatments and low profile agitators are about. People say "Oh, but the laundry dosen't move!" Yeah it moves less - visibly.
What counts is relative movement, relative movement of every part (laundry, water, tub, agitator, etc.) to each other.
If you pull the items through the water or isntead pull the water through the items DOES NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE!
The pre-2018 SQ TLs pulled laundry through the water, these 2018 models pull water through the laundry.
To solidify my view, I'll make a prediction right now that I am almost entirely sure about that it will come true:
People who will use to high waterlevels for to small loads will be EXTREMLY underwhelmed by the cleaning. If the laundry can just float around in the water, the agitub movement will not be abled to create that sudden reversing effect of the laundry in relation to the wash water and the laundry and water instead will move as one item, simply because there is to little friction between the load and the moving parts. Then, there is no reverse waterflow in relation to the items being washed, and barely any water wiil be moved through the fabrics.
This washer will deliver the best results with the just-about-loosely-filled-up type of loads (in relation to the selected water level, of course).
To little laundry for the water level will mean that that agitub can't effectivley "grip onto" the washload and can't move it efgectivley back and forth.
Too much laundry will be to much resitance to the waterflow and thus the reversing periods won't be enough to force water and detergent solution through every layer of the overly densly packed load.
Really, after the first few agiation moves I thought everybody had to realize that they did that switch-up of what is moving in relation to what now.
But apparently verry few people actually give thought to what that water that they o-so desire in ridiculous amounts does.
