So, about digital product development
There is a lot of reasons for digital development.
We do basically all predevelopment - down to efficiency and reliability - digitally.
Verification is done on physical models or real appliances - and it takes ages.
Running even accelerated wear tests for 10 years or more of usage takes months to years.
I do think the whole concrete weight thing is more of a quality assurance issue.
I do think that that part is a supplier bought part.
LG did a quick row back on that issue and did several rebate/promo programms - I wouldn't be surprised if they just switched supplier quickly.
We got ours under one of them.
What is most interesting is that a model fron the very same base design did NOT fail in the same way in the same tests a year earlier and it excelled in the test.
Either they got insanely lucky in 2021, or they just switched supplier and the quality of the new supplier wasn't up to par.
As another related note:
At work, we switched supplier for a row of similar glas parts for cost reasons.
All parts (12 in total) are just glas panes.
All parts always have to run through a row of tests before being greenlit for production use.
Once they pass, they only get checked periodically.
That supplier managed to deliver 11 of the 12 parts perfectly within spec.
But one of the 12 parts is going into its third round of sampling because they are out of spec again.
I'm not saying that that failure is ok to happen.
Just that having a production run being out of spec with such a part is totally possible to happen with every manufacturer.
