Coming Eventually, the New and "Improved" Super Forum

Automatic Washer - The world's coolest Washing Machines, Dryers and Dishwashers

Help Support :

> But if it makes everyone's life better, why not ban the topics of politics, sex and religion, since they have no place in an open forum when they get nasty. Isure as hell won't miss any of it. <

Andrew, an open forum is precisely that. Open.

Also, your suggestion has already been discussed in this thread. Every one (or nearly all) of the calls to ban political discussions in the Super Forum have come from the minority of Republican AW members who, for whatever reason, can't seem to follow the simple "if you don't like it, don't read it" advice.
 
Jeff...

With all due respect I am trying to figure out how Shane was making a sideswipe at a member. I think that he was a hell of a lot more polite than I was toward the same person when I wrote, "Let's face it... all of this bull$hit has come about because of one megalomaniacal, proselytizing, dramatic and, dare I say, psychopathic "wing nut" who wouldn't recognize a two by four if it was swung into his forehead." If you take a look at some other resposes, you'll see at least a couple other so-called, "sideswipes" that were a little more direct than what Shane posted.

Sounds to me like you have a problem with Shane, and not so much what he said. I hope that's not true, but if it is, then I would hope you would keep it between the two of you, and private, as Shane invited you to do. What he said was quite "spot-on" I think. I also think what I posted wasn't too far off either, at least from the private responses I've received in the last day or so.

RICH
 
And Jeff:

Count me among the liberals who doesn't care for the political discusson here. In fact, my impression about who does or does not care for such discussion here is exactly the opposite of yours.
 
Rich, Shane posted:

"I find it rather bizarre that a certain member, who creates alot of the animosity in this forum, has the nerve to offer suggestions."

So now, at least a dozen members are sitting there thinking he's referring to them.

But you're right, he's not the only one who's made these indirect swipes. I have zero personal problems with Shane, or anyone else on AW. I don't even know the guy (from his pic, I'm pretty sure I'd like to :-). All I'm saying is, if you have something to say to someone, direct your comment to them, not to Robert. IMO this is the only problem with the Super Forum. Don't dump your trash on Robert's lap, make him your cybernanny, and make other members needlessly defensive.
 
Sandy, it was because of you I added the "nearly all" part. :-) But the basic point is still correct IMO.
 
Um,

I do believe Robert opened this thread to suggestions, not to making threats of physical violence and attacking people.

Personally, I would prefer for those here who have 'issues' with me to use my name - panthera or Keven, instead of making abstruse comments on the grounds plausible denial.

Actually, tho', I'd appreciate it greatly if perc-o-prince (either/both) would lay off the threats of physical violence. W

Hint: When you are trying to convince everyone that you are the poor, wee, innocent victim of a great big jungle cat, you don't advance your case by letting lose with language which is far nastier than anything you claim to be affronted by.
 
Jeff,

I think subtlety is something that's often overlooked and under-used in modern times. Everything's gotta be right in the face or it can't be understood. Perhaps those of us who use it give others credit they don't deserve? Like credit for having more than three living brain cells with two of those on respirators? Is a map really necessary? Do a dozen members of this forum REALLY think it could be them? If anyone thinks it could be them, please email me off-list and I'll let you know it isn't (knowing who WON'T email me!).

Just think back to the entire reason this thread was even started (if I may presume, Robert). The now-closed "balls" thread, IIRC. And who started that? Is the picture coming into a little more focus?

That said, I know Toggle was a little more subtle than I was, as was Rich, and I'll throw Shane and Rickr into that group as well. If I missed anyone, sorry! I, on the other hand, wasn't as subtle. A larger picture of a muzzled German Shephard? A link to synthetic heroin available in Germany? Get it???

Chuck (NOT Rich)
p.s.- I guess I don't get how anything any of the aforementioned folk posted was trash dumped on Robert's lap, or required him to be a cybernanny. In fact, many posts have supported something that would NOT cause Robert any additional coding work, though you wouldn't be happy about it.
 
> p.s.- I guess I don't get how anything any of the aforementioned folk posted was trash dumped on Robert's lap, or required him to be a cybernanny. <

Chuck, Shane's sideswipe, in fact a few others as well have been addressed to Robert. How is that not trash dumped on his lap?
 
After the BS I see here and the hate

I can understand if he decide to just pull the plug and end it. Just too much crap// if you have anything to say with your nasty cracks about what i say EMAIL ME DIRECT !
 
Personally, I would prefer for those here who have 'issues' with me to use my name - panthera or Keven, instead of making abstruse comments on the grounds plausible denial.

Ummmmm, Thanks, but I'll stick with this....

 
Shane, I commend you for being man enough to try to make ammends. For those that have sat in judgment of him because of any supposed political leanings, that is truly disguisting. Seems to me like Shane makes two posts and gets crucified.

As far as the dog with a muzzle, it is unfortunate that the best image I could find (that wasn't kinky beyond belief) was of that breed. But my point is we have a few rabid dogs here that don't know when to STFU and back-off already. Myself included.

So. unevolved testosterone-laden men wnat to destroy their enemies often physically, and unevolved females want to verbally destroy reputations, gossip and tear the character of others to shreds/threads.

Congratualtiosn to us. We've gotten lower than both.

And honeslty if you really think the Republicans, the Liberals, the Martians, the Muslims, the Christian(-ists) are singlehandedly out to get you, get some help already.

And before anyone calls anyone else names, one should look in the mirror. I know who I am EXACTLY, good AND EVIL. Do you know realistically who YOU are?

RANT over.

Sorry kids I have a bad cold/infecition since Thursday and am sitting in the house stir-crazy. Acutally that's my Aunt-flo' knocking at the door. Gotta go answer it.

PEACE OUT! Love ya, mean it!
 
Knock it off you guys, sheesh if Id acted like this growing up my parents would have beat me to a pulp!!!

Anyway back to the real problems at hand one being something I touched on earlier and strongenough78 has mentioned twice is donations to Robert for all he has given us.Anyone up for a start date? Every month? Once a year? Once every six months?

Seems like this is one way we could assist Robert since theres very little we can do about the rest of the problems we cause for him.
 
Ill agree with Jeff G on one thing (from the looks of his ) picture (sudshane)Id like to know him.

All others in agreement say aye

Shane is a foxy stud
 
I don't know why...

But somehow this whole ruckus reminds me of those Monty Python skits where the guys are all in house dresses swinging big purses at each other.

In the mud.

;-)
 
Since you asked.............

To be perfectly clear, neither Rich nor I have made ANY threats, direct or veiled, of physical violence to ANYONE, publicly or privately.

If, "...wouldn't recognize a two by four if it was swung into his forehead..." is in question, that's an American colloquialism. Actually, I believe it goes, "wouldn't know a 2 x 4 if it hit him upside the head," but close enough. It refers to the inability to recognize something that is, or has been made, perfectly clear.

**********************************************
(The above was written about an hour or so ago before other posts were made, but had to sit as I had a sick pet-thing to deal with. More posts have probably been made since I resumed writing this.)
**********************************************

Now, YES, Keven, was there any question that you were the one myself and others have been referring to? I tried to make it clear without being blunt. You see, I too am German, but only about half. I can temper my German arrogance and bluntness with common sense. You have seemingly not found that balance, but, hey, everyone's different! I think it's safe to say that we celebrate diversity on this forum!

What I'd like to suggest, if I may, is that you ask your doctor about a meds adjustment. Just please make sure it's one of your MDs in Munich. I think you'll agree, if you haven't said it already, that US doctors can't hold a candle to them!

Chuck
 
Humm, what an example

Robert simply asked for suggestions on how to handle avoiding the BS this thread has become.
I have always known that I was gay and have been very proud of it. You all make me ashamed of myself. It's no wonder we have the reputation we do with " STRAIGHT PEOPLE". This is exactly the reason I have never fit in with my own kind. DRAMA DRAMA DRAMA. Hopefully people visiting for the first time won't be so turned off that they won't consider becoming members.
Robert thank you for all you have done and continue to do with YOUR web site and any changes YOU make will be fine with me. Mark
 
Chuck,

I am not on meds nor am I mentally ill. This is another one of your (and Rickr) and several others here attempts at attacking me which cause deep distress to the many who actually are coping with various illnesses. Why the hatred?

I deeply resent your threats. I am quite familiar with the idiom, thank you and the intent remains the same. Inexcusable. I have never threatened anyone here verbally, much less physically.
I have never called the FBI on someone here.
I have never called the employer of someone here and had them fired.

This has gone too far.

Robert opened this thread to ask us for our suggestions, not for attacks on various people. Not only have I been attacked, other people here have as well.

That, alone, negates your argument that were Robert to ban me, all would be sweetness and light.

I've made my suggestions to Robert, regardless of his decision(s) I will abide by them and, yes, I would be very happy to pay him a fee for the use of this site.

Sandy, you're absolutely right, time to put a stake through it's heart. I am sorry you and I disagree as to the function of this forum, the more I read here, the more inclined I become to see your point of view.

I'm done with this thread. The hatred being directed towards so many here is truly unfortunate.
 
The hatred being directed towards so many here is truly unfo

Change HATRED to ANGER, and SO MANY to KEVEN, and I agree completely (new sentence would read, "The anger being directed towards Keven here is truly unfortunate.").

Stick a fork in me, I'm done. No reasoning with the unreasonable, and those who refuse to admit they have a problem will always have it.

Robert, my apologies. I got sucked in to it, but will resist further comment. As far as suggestions for the forum, I stand by my previous ones.

Off to dinner and Karaoke!!!

Chuck
 
Bickering

All of this bickering back and forth is really beyond absurd...this thread has turned into something far more obscene than anything in the topic that started this.
 
Mark is right

Without directing this at any one individual, please answer my questions. Does being able to thoroughly slash someones guts out make you a better person? Why is this vitriol (gay word of the month) only directed at people who can't or won't fight back? Or people who are to my way of thinking, marginally obnoxious. Why don't you direct your righteous hatred/fear/distaste/anger at people who REALLY deserve it? Like the mother or father who worked overtime to make you feel like less than dirt, the school bully who felt like it was his-her life calling to make you and others look like fools, the cops who perform phony raids on gay bars, the employer who threw you to the wolves for no good reason, the good preechurs who gleefully tell you you're gonna burn in HELL for bein' a perv, the kids down the block that want to yell and throw things at you because you're a fairy, the doctor that won't treat "those people" etc. I think you get the picture.

You're only denigrating and mocking the genuinely mentally ill and unstable by constantly throwing your righteous acidic diatribes at each other. And you feel it's your God Given Right to smash them because dammit, they're wrong, and they need to DIE!! What we have here is some ten or so people who are right no matter what, and will continue to pound it into each others skulls, because that too, makes you a quality, wonderful, good person and all around nice guy.

Robert, you have a great site. Don't let anyone or anything destroy it. I think the plug needs to be pulled on this thread.
 
But somehow this whole ruckus reminds me of those Monty Python skits where the guys are all in house dresses swinging big purses at each other.

Here ya go Rich:

<object width=425 height=344><param name=movie value=></param><param name=allowFullScreen value=true></param><param name=allowscriptaccess value=always></param><embed src= type=application/x-shockwave-flash allowscriptaccess=always allowfullscreen=true width=425 height=344></embed></object>
 
Enough >>>IS<<< ENOUGH!!!

This thread was started by Robert to ask us for >>>HELPFULL<<< suggestions on how we can make this site work better for all of us. He COULD have just done whatever he wanted and told us to lump it as is his right. This thread started out pretty well with some really good ideas and rapidly degraded into the very thread that started all this crap. Listen, this bickering will serve >>>ABSOLUTELY NO PURPOSE<<< other than to just ignite and continue some nasty flame war AANNDD it does not speak well of any of us to anyone who is visiting this site and wondering if they'd like to join us. Either help us all out by coming up with some suggestions that Robert was gracious enough to ask for or take your little disagreements to EMAIL!

Look, people, this comes from someone who doesn't really know many of you well (and wishes he did...) but likes pretty much every one of you (even Toggles when he's sick and cranky...) anyway and for some strange reason cares enough about you all that this arguing hurts. Yes, it hurts!

Time to focus, people...

RCD
 
Jeff: I don't remember who was the person who posted the link to Dr. Taylor's talk either, but consider the fact that the community here made a space for such a poster to do so. So, I am very grateful both to the poster and the community at large. Also, I hope your SO is better, kidney problems are not fun is what I gather from friends and family who went through similar things. And thank you so much for posting the link to other forums whether or not you were the original poster here, it really does help.

Everyone who corrected me on the Ebay/Craig's List thing. Thank you -- yes, I don't click on the posts, at least I don't click on most of them. I'm glad that it's helpful to people, I had the impression that it was, but now I'm sure. I have never complained about it before, and you can be sure that I won't in the future. My excuse, lame as it is, is that I posted more or less in a "stream of consciousness" style, with very little editing as it's evident by the grammatical and spelling errors. What I meant to say and failed, and you all stress my point for me, is that say I'm annoyed enough by a custom in this forum, like the heads up thing (which admittedly is very mildly annoying to me, I don't much care one way or another, but it was a good example to use and not rile up the entire forum) and somehow suppress it by some fluke and people can't post about it anymore. Then the people who were being helped by it will be missing something. More importantly, the community will change -- in this case not for the better. But anyone can make arguments that sound good/plausible, like "it's taking bandwidth", or "it's annoying to me", or "it offends me", or "I can't believe they aren't already looking there", or "well, they can't look all over the country but they can look at the places that they can truck the thing over for a reasonable price" or any number of other things. Thing is, I'm wrong about it, it helps other people. People I like and care about, so maybe I'm way better off not getting my druthers but getting the community/friends that I enjoy so much. I'll take the quirks the community has because it feels like family to me -- I don't get along with my entire family and friends all the time, but I try to overlook the bad-ish and be thankful for the good. Sometimes I fail, I'd like to think most of the time I succeed.

On the Ms. Manners thing. I like her the best among the etiquette people; she seems to not only accept but advance the idea that times change and we need to adapt. No one needs that extra 3 sets of fork, knife and spoon at a picnic or fast-food joint, even if you may need them at a full banquet. And she's very clear on the fact that no one has a god-given right to never be offended. It will happen sometimes. She's also completely against people who go the extra mile to take offense at things, that is one of the definitions of a rude person, a polite member of society is expected to look the other way on many many things instead of jumping to "I'm offended". It's unfortunately way too common for rude people to see someone's fly is open and "get offended" or, worse yet, "get offended on behalf of others, particularly children" and make a scandal. She's said in as many words that if you see someone whose pants have the fly open, or have a catsup or coffee stain etc, your best move is not to broadcast it to the world -- if there's a reasonable expectation that the person will think no one noticed and not be embarrassed, you're expected to keep your silence; on the other hand, if you are sure that it's very easy to notice, you are expected to quietly and as discreetly as possible to tell the person so they can deal with the situation in a dignified way. But she's not shy about offending people who already caused offense and sometimes deeply humiliating people in front of everybody without actually being accused of ever being rude. And her sarcasm is worth it. A few of her gems:

Dear Ms. Manners: a {black, gay, lesbian, mixed race, foreign} couple just moved across the street from me. What can I do to improve the neighborhood?

Gentle reader: move.

Dear Ms. Manners: what should I say when introduced to a {black, gay, lesbian, mixed race, foreign} couple?

Gentle reader: shake their hands while asking "How do you do? How do you do?"

Dear Ms. Manners: how do I introduce my son and his gay lover?

Gentle reader: "This is my son Jack and his friend Joe" -- it's permissible to pause briefly before the word "friend".

About credit cards as a form of age verification: one can essentially buy "gift cards" that work just like an ordinary credit card at the supermarket nowadays. On the positive side, one can reasonably claim that one made a good faith effort to limit access to adults that way.

Anyhow, in case it's not clear from my comments: I will support whatever Robert decides. My opinions here are just my opinions and they may be wrong, I am not offering them as "this is the right way of doing things" but really way more likely as "this is what's going on in my head". Please take it with a large grain of salt.

Cheers all,
-- Paulo.
 
Thanks Paulo. Ms. Manners is great, but she may wish to update her advice on the gay lover question. Maybe the "friend" bit was ok in the last century, not in this one. I mean nowadays a gay couple may be spouses! At the very least, "partner" or "significant other" is more appropriate IMO.

God forbid someone introduced me as my partner's "friend", knowing that we've been together 22 years as a monogamous couple, they'd receive an immediate and not-so-subtle correction (from my other half, not me).
 
Back
Top