I was on the GE website yesterday when I noticed that GE has added two new wahers to their line up and they actually advertise on the console that they are agitator washers! They claim a 3.9 cubic foot capacity and to have a "power rinse" option, and they claim to be energy star washers. I dunno, maybe GE got alot of complaints from consumers and this is a last ditch attempt to appease die hard top load washer fans? Any thoughts?
New GE 3.9 cu ft. Agitator Washer
- Thread starter mtn1584
- Start date
Help Support :
Nice washer
This is like my mothers washer, only bigger. It is an he washer, but it uses enough water to get the job done. Everything comes out nice and clean with no damage and no issues at all. The only difference seems to be this power rinse and the 3.9 cu ft. I think that if this washer works at all like the one my family has top load washer lovers will love this washer. The power rinse on this washer looks to be the true deep rinse, vs the shower rinse( no deep fill) Also like the control lay out with the soil level clealy marked, vs our famlies ge with no real markings on soil level.
-Andy
This is like my mothers washer, only bigger. It is an he washer, but it uses enough water to get the job done. Everything comes out nice and clean with no damage and no issues at all. The only difference seems to be this power rinse and the 3.9 cu ft. I think that if this washer works at all like the one my family has top load washer lovers will love this washer. The power rinse on this washer looks to be the true deep rinse, vs the shower rinse( no deep fill) Also like the control lay out with the soil level clealy marked, vs our famlies ge with no real markings on soil level.
-Andy
toploader1984
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 551
ge
i found some pictures
i found some pictures
toploader1984
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 551
ge
another
another
What kind of drive mechanism does it have?May have potential-as is the new WP belt drive.The new SQ just isn't available in my area.
macboy91si
Well-known member
Hydrowave
The control panel reads that its a Hydrowave machine. Also since when is "COLORS" a temperature. Also what strange increments in the control for the temp and I recall the switch clicks for phantom positions that aren't marked. Looking at that seam/joint in the SS tub I'm not terribly impressed there. Also many of these I see the SS is very dulled with use.
However, certainly seems to be a flexible machine and has a full-range water control dial. I question the reliability but with the crap shoot that overall recent GE laundry appliances have, it could last 2 or 10 years. Get out your dice...
-Tim
The control panel reads that its a Hydrowave machine. Also since when is "COLORS" a temperature. Also what strange increments in the control for the temp and I recall the switch clicks for phantom positions that aren't marked. Looking at that seam/joint in the SS tub I'm not terribly impressed there. Also many of these I see the SS is very dulled with use.
However, certainly seems to be a flexible machine and has a full-range water control dial. I question the reliability but with the crap shoot that overall recent GE laundry appliances have, it could last 2 or 10 years. Get out your dice...
-Tim
dogboy44
Well-known member
I am sad
This looks cheap. All the new stuff looks so discount.
This looks cheap. All the new stuff looks so discount.
Macboy, because it's a Hydrowave, I have no idea how long it'll last.
They did have issues with the mode selectors jamming in one position, so they'd be stuck in spin mode. As a result, the agitator wouldn't work properly and the inner tub would just spin back and forth.
I do agree that these tubs do dull with use, I think that's just a fact of life. I think any Stainless Steel tub will. In saying that, don't let the tub weld discourage you, these tubs are built very well. Whether or not they could withstand a 1000 RPM spin is a whole other matter though.
I don't really see a point to the ribbing on the inner tub though, I don't honestly see how it makes clothes cleaner.
I also have to admit that the selection for "Colors" as a temperature is kind of unique. Maybe it's just a way to make things easier for the housewife.
I will admit that is one thing that always bothered me about the GE's is how they have these dials with multiple detents that don't really do anything. For example, the "Super" cycle on my machine actually has three detents which can select the super cycle, even though it doesn't need them.
My guess is that it's cheaper to put in multi-detent selectors and then set up the programming so that those positions all do the same thing.
They did have issues with the mode selectors jamming in one position, so they'd be stuck in spin mode. As a result, the agitator wouldn't work properly and the inner tub would just spin back and forth.
I do agree that these tubs do dull with use, I think that's just a fact of life. I think any Stainless Steel tub will. In saying that, don't let the tub weld discourage you, these tubs are built very well. Whether or not they could withstand a 1000 RPM spin is a whole other matter though.
I don't really see a point to the ribbing on the inner tub though, I don't honestly see how it makes clothes cleaner.
I also have to admit that the selection for "Colors" as a temperature is kind of unique. Maybe it's just a way to make things easier for the housewife.
I will admit that is one thing that always bothered me about the GE's is how they have these dials with multiple detents that don't really do anything. For example, the "Super" cycle on my machine actually has three detents which can select the super cycle, even though it doesn't need them.
My guess is that it's cheaper to put in multi-detent selectors and then set up the programming so that those positions all do the same thing.
I sent GE a message on Facebook about the Power Rinse and asked them what does it do. There is no info on the website about it nor in the instruction manual. I hate when they don't explain what a feature does.
ptcruiser51
Well-known member
@ qualin
According to my GE factory rep, the raised ridges in the tub have nothing to do with cleaning. Their purpose is to add "area" to the tub so that more fabric comes in contact during the spin to maximize liquid removal. We don't have these models yet, they're supposed to come in to our THD within weeks. Some LG TLs use the same concept with raised circular bumps instead of ridges.
According to my GE factory rep, the raised ridges in the tub have nothing to do with cleaning. Their purpose is to add "area" to the tub so that more fabric comes in contact during the spin to maximize liquid removal. We don't have these models yet, they're supposed to come in to our THD within weeks. Some LG TLs use the same concept with raised circular bumps instead of ridges.
supersurgilator
Well-known member
The "bigger" tub doesn't surprise me a bit, in fact that is going to be the only thing to save toploaders. If the tub has more cubic feet and the water consumption stays the same, the water factor goes down and therefore it will still meet the energy guidelines.
Yeah it's all fine and dandy BUT WHERE'S THE MINI BASKET !!
To Petek:
You know, that was one of the things that bothered me about the new GE's.
When I bought my washer in 2004, I was ignorant enough to think that I was going to get my hands on a Filter-Flo, without realizing that they had revamped the entire line about 6 years ago.
It's kind of sad when you consider that rather than improving on the Filter-Flo technology and using computer aided design to make it all that much more better, they instead got rid of it all and just made conventional machines.
It's like a step backwards in technology because they got rid of the lint filter completely. (Either that or it's an automatic one that I can't see?)
I think with the advent of energy star, they could have fudged it a bit by keeping the Mini-Basket for those smaller loads.
I think the move to Stainless Steel tubs is a really good move though. Back in 2004, only the TOL machines had them. Now it seems almost every GE Top loading machine has them, except for the cheapo plastic tubbed machines.
I don't think that removing the Filter Flo tray was a bother at all...
I certainly would like to hear from the GE engineers why the redesign didn't include this technology.. Maybe they didn't feel it was all that effective?
You know, that was one of the things that bothered me about the new GE's.
When I bought my washer in 2004, I was ignorant enough to think that I was going to get my hands on a Filter-Flo, without realizing that they had revamped the entire line about 6 years ago.
It's kind of sad when you consider that rather than improving on the Filter-Flo technology and using computer aided design to make it all that much more better, they instead got rid of it all and just made conventional machines.
It's like a step backwards in technology because they got rid of the lint filter completely. (Either that or it's an automatic one that I can't see?)
I think with the advent of energy star, they could have fudged it a bit by keeping the Mini-Basket for those smaller loads.
I think the move to Stainless Steel tubs is a really good move though. Back in 2004, only the TOL machines had them. Now it seems almost every GE Top loading machine has them, except for the cheapo plastic tubbed machines.
I don't think that removing the Filter Flo tray was a bother at all...
I certainly would like to hear from the GE engineers why the redesign didn't include this technology.. Maybe they didn't feel it was all that effective?
laundromat
Well-known member
worst washer I've seen since the old F/WCIs dissapeared.
The pre-hydrowave machines seem to do a decent job.. but my FL does a much better job of cleaning since I switched. Mine always had a huge problem with dealing with lots of pairs of jeans. They'd just sit there and swish back and forth with no turnover. I'd actually have to underload the machine so I could get turnover.
I think part of the problem was the really short agitator stroke.. I think it's only about 30 degrees with the pre-hydrowave models.. Actual hydrowave models I think do a 360 degree stroke I think. I'm not sure how much better the turnover would be, but I can tell you, I wouldn't want to own a washer that sounds like a car alarm.
I think part of the problem was the really short agitator stroke.. I think it's only about 30 degrees with the pre-hydrowave models.. Actual hydrowave models I think do a 360 degree stroke I think. I'm not sure how much better the turnover would be, but I can tell you, I wouldn't want to own a washer that sounds like a car alarm.
aldspinboy
Well-known member
I like the hydrowave wash system ..just wished it was made again more sturdy.
And thats everyones wish with other brands as well.
Anyway Bud according to GE the ribes in ther baskets which is not new ..
is to squeez more water out of the clothes 20 percent more at 640 rpm's.
Now there 700 rpm's.
In spit of the HE type water saving spray rinse system which is a Fisher & Paykel trait.
The washer could be better if more water was not restricted... and it is a 360 arc in the agitation mode.
Hey it is a washer that does not lock and easy to see with a magnet.
The styling is today weather you like it or not.
Again the QUIT thang people want unfortunetly.
Darren k
And thats everyones wish with other brands as well.
Anyway Bud according to GE the ribes in ther baskets which is not new ..
is to squeez more water out of the clothes 20 percent more at 640 rpm's.
Now there 700 rpm's.
In spit of the HE type water saving spray rinse system which is a Fisher & Paykel trait.
The washer could be better if more water was not restricted... and it is a 360 arc in the agitation mode.
Hey it is a washer that does not lock and easy to see with a magnet.
The styling is today weather you like it or not.
Again the QUIT thang people want unfortunetly.
Darren k
